Skip to main content
DOT Compliance-16 min read-Published May 15, 2026

What Brokers Are About to Check Before They Book Your Truck

Quick Answer

State courts decide, applying the 'ordinary care' standard from each jurisdiction's negligent-hiring doctrine. There is no single federal standard, but the practical baseline is what brokers' E&O insurance underwriters demand, because that's the workflow brokers will adopt to keep their coverage.

After the Supreme Court's 9-0 ruling in Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II on May 14, 2026, freight brokers face a new legal exposure when they hire carriers with red flags. The "ordinary care" standard now expected of brokers translates into a concrete, repeatable 6-point check that brokers' lawyers and E&O insurance underwriters are demanding on every load. Here is the exact checklist, what each item means, what triggers a refusal, and how to fix it before you lose loads.

Quick context: If you haven't read the explainer on the ruling yet, the Montgomery v. Caribe Transport overview covers what changed and why. This post focuses on the practical checklist brokers will use to vet you.

Check 1: FMCSA Safety Rating

The safety rating is the single most important headline data point on your record. It is issued by FMCSA under 49 CFR Part 385 after a compliance review (either an on-site review or a streamlined offsite review). The three possible values: Satisfactory, Conditional, and Unsatisfactory.

  • Satisfactory: the green light. Brokers will not refuse loads on the basis of safety rating alone.
  • Conditional: the new refuse trigger. Pre-Montgomery, Conditional cost you insurance premium dollars. Post-Montgomery, it costs you loads, because most broker E&O underwriters are now excluding negligent-hiring coverage when the hired carrier has a Conditional rating.
  • Unsatisfactory: out-of-service for federal regulations. You shouldn't be hauling. If you are, brokers will refuse.

Most carriers don't have an assigned safety rating because they've never been formally audited. That's actually a neutral signal: no rating means no negative rating. Brokers will treat unrated carriers as a "look deeper" case rather than an automatic refusal.

What triggers a refusal: Conditional or Unsatisfactory ratings, especially if the underlying compliance review was within the last 24 months.

How to fix: If you have a Conditional rating, you can petition FMCSA for a rating upgrade after completing corrective action. See the separate post on the 90-day Conditional-to-Satisfactory fix path.

Check 2: Driver and Vehicle OOS Rates

Out-of-service (OOS) rates measure the percentage of your inspections that result in a driver or vehicle being placed out of service. National averages, updated by FMCSA periodically, sit around 5.5% for drivers and 20.0% for vehicles (2025 data). A carrier materially above these averages signals systemic compliance issues.

Brokers check both rates in the FMCSA SMS public portal. Some broker workflows weight vehicle OOS rate higher because vehicle defects directly cause crashes (brake failure, tire blowouts, lighting failures). Other workflows weight driver OOS rate higher because driver violations (HOS, fatigue, controlled substances) correlate with crash severity.

What triggers a refusal: driver OOS rate above 10% or vehicle OOS rate above 30%. Some strict brokers refuse at OOS rates merely above the national average.

How to fix: address the underlying causes. Common driver-OOS causes: expired medical certificates, expired CDLs, false log entries. Common vehicle-OOS causes: brake adjustments, tire issues, lighting/reflectors, exhaust system defects. Implementing pre-trip inspection rigor and tracking maintenance schedules in software (rather than a clipboard) reduces vehicle OOS dramatically.

Check 3: CSA BASICs Scores

CSA (Compliance, Safety, Accountability) BASICs are continuous performance scores in seven categories: Unsafe Driving, Hours of Service, Vehicle Maintenance, Controlled Substances/Alcohol, Hazardous Materials Compliance, Driver Fitness, and Crash Indicator. Each BASIC produces a percentile score from 0 (best) to 100 (worst), recalculated monthly from inspection and crash data.

FMCSA sets intervention thresholds at the 65th percentile for general carriers (50th for hazmat/passenger). Crossing a threshold puts you on FMCSA's intervention list, which historically triggered enforcement actions. After Montgomery, it also triggers broker refusals, because being above intervention threshold is documented foreseeable risk that a broker can't easily defend hiring.

The five BASICs brokers weight most: Unsafe Driving, Hours of Service, Vehicle Maintenance, Controlled Substances, Crash Indicator. The Hazmat BASIC matters only for hazmat carriers. Driver Fitness rarely crosses thresholds for active carriers.

What triggers a refusal: any BASIC percentile above the intervention threshold, especially Unsafe Driving or Vehicle Maintenance.

How to fix: BASICs are calculated on a 24-month rolling window. The fastest path to a lower percentile is preventing new violations and accumulating clean inspections that age the bad ones out. Some violations can be challenged through FMCSA's DataQs system if you have evidence the citation was incorrect.

Check 4: Recent Inspection History

The previous 24 months of roadside inspections, retrievable via the FMCSA SMS or the Inspection Selection System. Brokers will scan for specific violation patterns rather than total count, because clean inspections actually help your BASICs and signal regular law-enforcement contact (which is unavoidable, not negative).

Violations brokers flag immediately:

  • OOS-defect vehicle maintenance violations (defective brakes, OOS tires, inoperative lighting)
  • Driver-license issues (driving while suspended, wrong CDL class, expired CDL)
  • HOS pattern violations (multiple HOS citations within a short window suggest systemic ELD or scheduling problems)
  • Controlled-substance positive tests or refusals
  • Hazmat violations (for hazmat carriers)

What triggers a refusal: any of the above within the last 12 months, especially clustered patterns.

How to fix: ensure pre-trip inspections are documented and enforced, run quarterly internal HOS audits against your ELD data, and verify Clearinghouse compliance for every active driver every quarter (the Clearinghouse query check is part of Check 5).

Check 5: Driver Qualification File Completeness

The six DQF items required by 49 CFR 391:

  1. Employment application with full 10-year history (49 CFR 391.21)
  2. Current DOT medical certificate, not expired (49 CFR 391.43, FMCSA National Registry)
  3. Annual MVR review, within the last 12 calendar months for every state the driver holds a license in (49 CFR 391.25)
  4. Annual Certificate of Violations, signed within the last 12 months (49 CFR 391.27)
  5. Road test or CDL equivalency (49 CFR 391.31, 391.33)
  6. Drug & Alcohol Clearinghouse query, both pre-employment full and annual limited (49 CFR 382.701)

For the load-specific dispatch, brokers will typically request DQF documentation for just the dispatched driver. Items 1 (employment application) and 5 (road test/CDL) only need to be verified at hire and don't expire. Items 2, 3, 4, and 6 have explicit renewal windows.

What triggers a refusal: expired medical certificate (immediate OOS for the driver), missing or expired Clearinghouse query (driver prohibited from operating), missing annual MVR or Certificate of Violations (carrier in violation under 49 CFR 391).

How to fix: set 60-day-out reminders for every renewal-window item. Manual tracking in spreadsheets fails predictably; software that tracks expiration dates and surfaces alerts is the only reliable approach for any fleet beyond 5 drivers.

Check 6: Active COI with Required Limits

Federal minimum liability coverage under 49 CFR 387:

  • $750,000 for general property (non-hazardous freight)
  • $1,000,000 for oil and certain hazmat
  • $5,000,000 for the highest-risk hazmat categories

These are minimums. Most brokers will require $1M-$2M for general freight regardless of the federal minimum, especially after Montgomery v. Caribe drives broker E&O premiums up. Many brokers will also require their company specifically named as Certificate Holder or Additional Insured on your COI, so the broker has direct rights under the policy.

What triggers a refusal: expired or lapsed coverage (sometimes visible in L&I but often only catchable via direct certificate request), coverage below the broker's required limit, or refusal/inability to name the broker as additional insured.

How to fix: work with your insurance agent to establish a default COI template that lists your common brokers as additional insureds, with auto-update on renewal. Avoid one-off per-load COI requests that delay bookings.

How Audit-Ready Are You?

Take our 30-second compliance check to see where your system stands. No email required.

3 quick questions
Instant risk score
Free personalized report

How FileFlo helps you pass

Five of the six checks above are about underlying compliance posture: safety rating, OOS rate, BASICs, inspection history. Those depend on operational discipline (driver training, maintenance schedules, HOS enforcement) and time, not software. FileFlo can support that work with audit trails and corrective-action documentation, but the operational change is on you.

Check 5 (DQF completeness) and Check 6 (COI currency) are documentation problems. Most carriers fail these not because of bad operations but because of missing paperwork. That's where FileFlo's daily value sits: it tracks every renewal-window item, alerts you 60 days out, and assembles the broker-ready packet on demand. The Pro tier ($299/mo, unlimited drivers and documents) also includes the Broker-Ready Share Link feature, rolling out this month, which generates a single URL brokers can use to verify all of the above in 30 seconds without you scrambling per load.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

State courts decide, applying the 'ordinary care' standard from each jurisdiction's negligent-hiring doctrine. There is no single federal standard, but the practical baseline is what brokers' E&O insurance underwriters demand, because that's the workflow brokers will adopt to keep their coverage. The underwriting consensus is hardening within days of the ruling: check publicly available FMCSA data (safety rating, OOS rates, BASIC scores, inspections), verify current insurance, confirm DQF completeness for the dispatched driver, document the entire process. Brokers who follow that workflow have the strongest defense in any future litigation.

If the carrier's documentation is already in order: roughly 10 minutes. The broker pulls FMCSA SMS data (3 minutes), verifies the COI you provide (2 minutes), confirms DQF status for the named driver (3 minutes), and documents the decision (2 minutes). If the carrier doesn't have documentation ready, the broker is back to chasing PDFs over email, and most brokers will simply move to the next carrier whose paperwork is in order. The carrier who delivers a complete packet in 5 minutes usually books the load over the carrier who promises to send it tomorrow.

For DQF and Clearinghouse-query checks, brokers will typically focus on the specific driver dispatched on the load. For the safety-rating, OOS, BASIC, and inspection checks, brokers look at the carrier-level data because that's what's publicly available. The exception: some larger brokers with stricter compliance teams will require DQF documentation for your full active roster, on the theory that any unqualified driver in your operation is a foreseeable liability for them.

Yes. The legal standard applies regardless of fleet size. The compliance items required by 49 CFR 391 (DQF), 49 CFR 382 (drug & alcohol), 49 CFR 387 (insurance), and 49 CFR 390.19 (MCS-150) apply to any carrier operating interstate. The good news for owner-operators: there's only one DQF to maintain. The bad news: any gap in that one DQF is the gap brokers refuse you on. Owner-operators who keep their single DQF, Clearinghouse query, MVR, and medical certificate current have a real competitive advantage over peers who don't.

You're safe from the broker's lawsuit (you didn't fail any duty by being hired). You're still on the hook for your own compliance under FMCSA regulations, but Montgomery v. Caribe doesn't add carrier liability โ€” it adds broker liability for hiring carriers like you. The practical effect is one-directional: brokers are now incentivized to refuse risky carriers. As a carrier, your job is to be the carrier they don't refuse.

Current as of the booking date, with the broker named as certificate holder or additional insured. Most brokers will require a refreshed COI within 30 days of the load. Federal minimums under 49 CFR 387: $750,000 general property, $1,000,000 oil, $5,000,000 hazmat. Many brokers will demand $1M-$2M general liability regardless of cargo, especially after Montgomery v. Caribe drives their E&O premiums up. Get a default certificate template from your agent that auto-adds brokers, instead of requesting a new COI per load.

Safety rating is a single overall designation (Satisfactory / Conditional / Unsatisfactory) issued by FMCSA after a compliance review. Most carriers do not have an assigned safety rating, only those who've been audited. CSA BASICs are continuous performance scores in 7 categories (Unsafe Driving, HOS, Vehicle Maintenance, Controlled Substances, Hazmat, Driver Fitness, Crash Indicator) calculated from inspection and crash data. Every carrier with enough inspections has BASIC scores. Brokers check both: the headline rating tells them whether you've been formally evaluated, the BASICs tell them how you're trending.

Related Articles

Continue learning about compliance and operational excellence

Pass every broker check, automatically.

FileFlo tracks every document a broker will ask for and alerts you 60 days before anything expires. 5-day free trial, no credit card to start.

How Audit-Ready Are You?

Take our 30-second compliance check to see where your system stands. No email required.

3 quick questions
Instant risk score
Free personalized report

You Might Also Like

More Related Articles

Compliance Operations

12 articles on this topic

Explore Compliance Operations solutions