Best EMR / TRIR / DART Safety Scorecard Tracking Software 2026
An independent comparison of 7 platforms for tracking the OSHA recordable injury metrics that drive insurance EMR, federal contracting prequalification, and general-contractor subcontract approval — 29 CFR Part 1904 recordkeeping, §1904.7 recordable determinations, §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 / 300A / 301 outputs, §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission, TRIR and DART rate calculation, the NCCI Experience Rating Plan EMR worksheet inputs, and the ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz contractor safety scorecard packages.
Quick Picks: Best EMR / TRIR / Safety Scorecard Tracking Software by Use Case
Why EMR / TRIR / DART Safety Scorecard Tracking Matters in 2026
The OSHA recordable-injury metrics layer sits on top of the substantive Subpart standards in 29 CFR Part 1926 for construction and 29 CFR Part 1910 for general industry and feeds the most consequential downstream gate construction and general-industry employers face: the owner-client or general-contractor safety prequalification scorecard. The foundation regulation is 29 CFR Part 1904 (Recording and reporting occupational injuries and illnesses), which sets the recordable-determination criteria and the OSHA Form 300 / 300A / 301 recordkeeping forms that produce the TRIR and DART rate numerators. The single most consequential provision in the entire workflow is 29 CFR §1904.7 (General recording criteria), which under §1904.7(b)(1) through §1904.7(b)(7) defines when a work-related injury or illness counts as OSHA-recordable — death, days away from work, restricted work or job transfer, medical treatment beyond first aid, loss of consciousness, significant injury or illness diagnosed by a licensed health care professional, or any of the special-recording-criteria conditions in §1904.8 through §1904.12. The §1904.7(b)(5)(ii) first-aid list (14 enumerated treatments) is the line that separates a recordable medical-treatment case from a non-recordable first-aid case. The §1904 recordable record set feeds the OSHA Form 300 Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, the OSHA Form 300A Summary, and the OSHA Form 301 Incident Report under 29 CFR §1904.29 (Forms). The §1904.32 year-end review and §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification of the 300A annual summary is what turns the year's loose entries into the official record the §1904.41 ITA submission draws from. The §1904.41 ITA electronic submission under 29 CFR §1904.41 (Electronic submission of injury and illness records to OSHA) is what makes the data visible to OSHA enforcement for Site-Specific Targeting inspections under the OSHA SST National Emphasis Program — the 2023 final rule, effective January 1, 2024, expanded §1904.41(a)(3) to require establishments with 100 or more employees in Appendix B high-hazard industries to electronically submit the OSHA Form 300 Log and OSHA Form 301 Incident Report case-level data (in addition to the 300A) by March 2 each year.
The penalty math is meaningful. Under 29 CFR §1903.15 (Proposed penalties), the OSHA federal maximum is $16,131 per serious violation and up to $161,323 per willful or repeat violation based on the 2024 inflation adjustment. Recordkeeping citations are commonly issued under §1904.7 (wrong recordable determination on a specific case), §1904.29 (failure to use OSHA Forms 300, 300A, or 301 or to record a recordable case within seven calendar days), §1904.32 (failure to review the 300 Log, certify the 300A annual summary by a §1904.32(b)(4) company executive, or post the 300A from February 1 through April 30), §1904.33 (failure to retain the 300, 300A, 301, and related records for 5 years following the end of the calendar year), §1904.35 (failure to involve employees in the recordkeeping system), §1904.39 (failure to report a fatality within 8 hours or an inpatient hospitalization, amputation, or eye loss within 24 hours), and §1904.41 (failure to electronically submit the 300A and, for the expanded §1904.41(a)(3) high-hazard establishments, the 300 Log and 301 Incident Report by March 2). The downstream consequence is more meaningful than the §1903.15 penalty for many employers — the OSHA recordable rate translates directly into the TRIR and DART rate the contractor's owner clients and general contractors use to gate subcontract award. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes the annual industry-average TRIR and DART rates by NAICS code (construction-industry TRIR national average is typically in the 2.4-3.0 range, with specialty trade contractor sub-industries varying widely), and the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) Experience Rating Plan baseline EMR is approximately 1.00 across most workers-compensation classification codes — an EMR above 1.00 typically disqualifies a contractor from federal construction contracting under USACE EM 385-1-1, from most major general-contractor subcontract bid lists, and from owner-direct work for many oil-and-gas, chemical, and refining operators. The §1904 recordable-determination decision made on a single workshop minor injury can flow downstream through the TRIR / DART numerator, the workers-compensation claim, the 3-year NCCI experience period, and the EMR worksheet into the contractor's ability to bid the next federal contract.
What makes EMR / TRIR / DART scorecard tracking software valuable is not the underlying §1904.7 recordable determination — that decision still requires the employer (often with input from the licensed health care professional treating the case) to apply the §1904.7(b) general recording criteria, the §1904.5 work-relatedness analysis, and the §1904.6 new-case determination. The value is in the recordkeeping workflow that prevents the citations and the scorecard disputes that inspectors and prequalification reviewers actually flag. Most §1904 citations and most scorecard disputes are not about the underlying incident never having happened. They are about:
- §1904.7(b)(5) medical-treatment determinations made without documenting why the treatment exceeded the §1904.7(b)(5)(ii) first-aid list, with no audit trail when the determination is challenged
- §1904.29 entries on the OSHA 300 Log missing the case classification, the body part affected, the source of the injury, or the event description the form requires
- §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification of the 300A annual summary signed by someone who does not meet the company-executive definition
- §1904.33 retention failures dropping a §1904 record set inside the 5-year retention window, often during platform migrations or HR-system replacements
- §1904.39 fatality and severe injury reports submitted to the OSHA Area Office past the 8-hour or 24-hour window
- §1904.41 ITA electronic submission missed by the March 2 deadline, or submitted with case-level data that doesn't reconcile to the underlying §1904.29 records
- TRIR and DART rates calculated with the wrong total-hours denominator (excluding temporary workers under the §1904.31 multi-employer rules)
- NCCI EMR worksheet inputs that don't reconcile to the §1904 recordable case set because the workers-compensation claim and the §1904 record were treated as separate workstreams
- ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz scorecard packages built ad hoc per submission cycle, with TRIR / DART / LTIR rates that disagree with the §1904.41 ITA submission for the same period
These are not safety-program problems — they are workflow and evidence-layer problems. The right software closes the workflow gaps and keeps the supporting records (§1904 recordable case file, §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 / 300A / 301 outputs, §1904.32 executive certification, §1904.41 ITA submission record, TRIR / DART rate calculations with hours-worked denominator, NCCI EMR worksheet inputs, contractor management network scorecard packages) organized so the evidence is one click away when an OSHA compliance officer, an owner-client prequalification reviewer, or a workers-compensation auditor asks.
What the Software Actually Has to Cover
EMR / TRIR / DART safety scorecard tracking software splits into four layers. The recordable-determination layer holds the case-level data, the §1904.5 work-relatedness analysis, the §1904.6 new-case determination, the §1904.7(b) general recording criteria evaluation, the §1904.7(b)(5)(ii) first-aid-list comparison, and the audit trail showing why the case was or was not recorded. The recordkeeping forms layer holds the §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 Log entries, the §1904.29 OSHA Form 300A Summary, the §1904.29 OSHA Form 301 Incident Report, the §1904.32 year-end review and executive certification, and the §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission record. The metrics-calculation layer holds the TRIR (Total Recordable Incident Rate) calculation with the (cases × 200,000) ÷ hours-worked formula, the DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) rate calculation with the §1904.7(b)(2) and §1904.7(b)(3) cases in the numerator, the LTIR (Lost Time Incident Rate) calculation with just the §1904.7(b)(2) days-away cases, the severity rate calculation with the lost-workdays numerator, and the NCCI Experience Rating Plan EMR worksheet inputs reconciling against the workers-compensation claim file. The scorecard-package layer holds the ISN Networld safety scorecard, the Avetta safety scorecard, the Veriforce safety scorecard, the Browz safety scorecard, the federal-contracting USACE EM 385-1-1 Accident Prevention Plan package, and the written safety and health program documentation each owner-client network requires.
A small construction employer running an OSHA-published paper Form 300 and an Excel TRIR / DART spreadsheet can be operationally fine on the §1904 recording layer and still get tripped up because the §1904.41 ITA electronic submission was never made (or was made past the March 2 deadline), or because the TRIR / DART rates calculated for an ISN scorecard submission don't reconcile to the §1904.41 ITA data OSHA already has on file. A larger general-industry employer running an enterprise EHS suite can have hundreds of completed §1904 records and still get tripped up because the §1904.33 5-year retention clock dropped a 2019 case file when the EHS platform migrated from on-prem to SaaS in 2024, or because the §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification of the 2024 300A annual summary was signed by an HR director rather than someone who meets the company-executive definition. FileFlo is built to handle the recordable-determination layer, the recordkeeping forms layer, the metrics-calculation layer, and the scorecard-package layer alongside each other, which is why it sits at the top of this list for construction and general-industry employers whose biggest exposure is the gap between the §1904 record set, the §1904.41 ITA submission, the TRIR / DART / EMR rate calculations, and the owner-client scorecard package.
How We Evaluated Each Platform
We scored each platform across 6 criteria that matter for §1904 recordkeeping, §1904.41 ITA submission, TRIR / DART / EMR rate calculation, and contractor management network scorecards:
Side-by-Side Comparison: All 7 Platforms
| Feature | FileFlo | SafetyCulture | Cority | Intelex | EHS Insight | ISNetworld | Paper 300 + Excel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| §1904.7 Recordable Determination Workflow + Audit Trail | |||||||
| §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 / 300A / 301 Outputs | |||||||
| §1904.32(b)(4) Executive Certification Workflow | |||||||
| §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application Electronic Submission | |||||||
| TRIR / DART / LTIR / Severity Rate Calculation | |||||||
| NCCI EMR Worksheet Reconciliation | |||||||
| ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz Scorecard Package | |||||||
| §1904.33 5-Year Retention Across Platform Migrations | |||||||
| Federal-Contract (USACE EM 385-1-1) APP Package |
Pricing Comparison (Construction or General-Industry Employer With 25–500 Employees)
EHS-platform pricing is rarely listed publicly. Figures below are based on public vendor pages, published partner reseller pricing, and user-reported figures for mid-size employer tiers as of 2025; verify with each vendor for your specific scope and establishment count.
| Platform | Pricing Model | Annual Cost (25–500 employees) | Scorecard Workflow | Free Trial |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FileFlo | $299/mo flat ($3,588/yr) | $3,588/yr | Yes (§1904 + ITA + TRIR/DART + EMR + ISN/Avetta scorecard packages) | 5 days |
| SafetyCulture (iAuditor) | Per-user / mo (Premium tier) | ~$5,000–12,000/yr | Partial — incident capture strong, scorecard package thin | 30 days |
| Cority | Quote-based, per establishment (enterprise) | ~$25,000–100,000+/yr | Yes (corporate KPI dashboarding) | Demo only |
| Intelex | Quote-based, per module (enterprise) | ~$20,000–80,000+/yr | Yes (mature KPI dashboarding) | Demo only |
| EHS Insight | Per-user / mo (mid-market) | ~$8,000–25,000/yr | Yes (accessible mid-market pricing) | Demo only |
| ISNetworld (scorecard side) | Subscription fees paid by contractor | Variable — ~$1,000–5,000/yr per contractor | Receives scorecard from contractors — does not generate it | N/A |
| Paper OSHA 300 + Excel | OSHA-published forms + spreadsheet | $0 software, internal labor cost | Manual ITA upload | N/A |
Note: Enterprise EHS-suite pricing varies significantly with establishment count, employee count, and module selection. Cority and Intelex enterprise tiers typically fit Fortune 1000 operations with multiple establishments and corporate KPI dashboards. EHS Insight fits mid-market operations that want the OSHA 300 recordkeeping and TRIR / DART rate calculation without the enterprise-tier price. ISNetworld is paid by the contractor as a subscription fee for the owner-client contractor management network — it is not a replacement for the contractor's underlying §1904 recordkeeping system.
Detailed Reviews: Each Platform Evaluated
FileFlo
FileFlo is an AI-powered compliance documentation platform built for construction and general-industry employers managing 29 CFR Part 1904 recordkeeping (the §1904.7 recordable determination workflow with case-level §1904.5 work-relatedness, §1904.6 new-case, and §1904.7(b)(5)(ii) first-aid-list audit trail), the §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 Log of Work-Related Injuries and Illnesses, the §1904.29 OSHA Form 300A Summary, the §1904.29 OSHA Form 301 Incident Report, the §1904.32 year-end review and §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification, the §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission (including the expanded §1904.41(a)(3) 300 Log and 301 Incident Report submission for high-hazard 100+ establishments), the TRIR / DART / LTIR / severity rate calculations using the standardized (cases × 200,000) ÷ hours-worked formula, the NCCI Experience Rating Plan EMR worksheet inputs reconciling against the workers-compensation claim file, and the ISN Networld / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz contractor safety scorecard packages owner clients request before subcontract award. Each case file shows the §1904.7 recordable determination with audit trail, the §1904.29 Form 300 Log entry with the case classification, the §1904.29 Form 301 Incident Report narrative, the §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification of the 300A annual summary, the §1904.41 ITA electronic submission record, and the calculated TRIR / DART / LTIR rates with the hours-worked denominator including the §1904.31 multi-employer-relationship temporary worker hours. When an OSHA compliance officer, an owner-client prequalification reviewer, or a workers-compensation auditor challenges a §1904 record or a calculated rate, the evidence is one click away.
Strengths
- §1904.7 recordable-determination workflow with case-level audit trail
- §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 / 300A / 301 outputs with the §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification
- §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission, including the expanded §1904.41(a)(3) 300 Log + 301 case-level data
- TRIR / DART / LTIR / severity rate calculation with standardized (cases × 200,000) ÷ hours-worked formula
- NCCI EMR worksheet reconciliation against the workers-compensation claim file across the 3-year experience period
- ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz contractor safety scorecard package with TRIR / DART / LTIR / severity / EMR / OSHA citation history / written program
- §1904.33 5-year retention across platform migrations
- Federal-contract (USACE EM 385-1-1) Accident Prevention Plan package
- Flat $299/mo, unlimited users — pricing doesn't scale with employee count or establishment count
- 5-day free trial, no credit card required
Limitations
- Not a workers-compensation claims system — pair with the WC insurance carrier's claim file for the EMR loss-side reconciliation
- Not a mobile-first daily-inspection capture tool — pair with SafetyCulture if the field-level daily-inspection workflow is the priority
- Newer platform — smaller review presence than incumbent enterprise EHS suites
SafetyCulture (iAuditor)
SafetyCulture's iAuditor (now branded SafetyCulture) is the strongest mobile-first incident reporting and observation capture platform on this list and the natural fit for daily field data that feeds the §1904.7 recordable-determination workflow. The platform handles the field-data-capture layer cleanly — incident reports with photo and video capture, near-miss observations, daily JHA / pre-task plan capture, and the initial intake of a workshop minor injury all work in the mobile flow. The §1904.7 recordable determination, the §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 / 300A / 301 outputs, the §1904.41 ITA electronic submission, the TRIR / DART rate calculation, and the ISN / Avetta scorecard package are thinner than dedicated EHS suites — most users pair iAuditor with a documentation system for the §1904 recordkeeping and metrics layer.
Strengths
- Best mobile-first incident reporting and observation capture for daily field data
- Large template library covering incident reports, near-miss observations, JHA, pre-task plans, and toolbox talks
- Strong photo and video capture at the point of incident or observation
Limitations
- §1904.7 recordable determination workflow with audit trail is partial
- §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission is not native
- NCCI EMR worksheet reconciliation is not native
- ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz scorecard package is not native
- Per-user pricing scales fast with field-crew and supervisor headcount
Cority
Cority is a corporate-grade enterprise EHS suite with native OSHA 300 recordkeeping, TRIR and DART calculation engines, and incident-management workflow sized for multi-establishment operations. For Fortune 1000 employers with multiple establishments subject to the §1904.41 ITA submission and corporate KPI dashboards across business units, Cority delivers a mature OSHA 300 recordkeeping system, the §1904.7 recordable-determination workflow with case-level audit trail, the TRIR / DART / LTIR rate calculation with hours-worked denominator, and the §1904.41 ITA electronic submission. The enterprise price point puts Cority firmly in the corporate tier and out of reach for most mid-market and small employers.
Strengths
- Mature OSHA 300 recordkeeping with §1904.7 recordable-determination workflow
- TRIR / DART / LTIR rate calculation with corporate KPI dashboarding
- §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission across multi-establishment operations
- Strong fit for Fortune 1000 employers with corporate EHS programs
Limitations
- Enterprise pricing — out of reach for most mid-market and small employers
- Implementation timelines commonly span 6-12 months across multi-establishment rollouts
- ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz scorecard package generation is partial — users pair with contractor management network workflow
Intelex
Intelex is a mid-to-enterprise EHS platform with strong incident management, OSHA 300 recordkeeping, mature KPI dashboarding, and corporate scorecard reporting. The platform is modular — most customers buy specific Incident Management, Recordkeeping, and Dashboards modules rather than the full EHS suite. For mid-to-enterprise operations with established corporate EHS programs and an appetite for module-by-module configurability, Intelex delivers a mature §1904.29 OSHA 300 / 300A / 301 recordkeeping flow, the TRIR / DART rate calculation, the §1904.41 ITA electronic submission, and corporate KPI dashboarding sized for multi-establishment operations.
Strengths
- Modular architecture — Incident Management, Recordkeeping, and Dashboards modules buyable individually
- Mature OSHA 300 recordkeeping with §1904.7 recordable-determination workflow
- Strong KPI dashboarding for corporate scorecard reporting
- §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission supported
Limitations
- Per-module pricing can add up quickly across the full §1904 workflow
- Implementation timelines commonly span 4-8 months across module rollouts
- ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz scorecard package generation is partial
EHS Insight
EHS Insight is a mid-market EHS platform with OSHA 300 recordkeeping, TRIR / DART / LTIR calculation, and corporate KPI dashboarding at a more accessible price point than the enterprise suites. For employers in the 50-500 employee range that want OSHA 300 recordkeeping and TRIR / DART rate calculation without the enterprise-tier price tag and 6-12 month implementation, EHS Insight delivers a mature §1904.7 recordable-determination workflow, §1904.29 Form 300 / 300A / 301 outputs, and §1904.41 ITA electronic submission at a price point most mid-market employers can absorb without C-suite approval.
Strengths
- Accessible mid-market pricing relative to Cority and Intelex enterprise tiers
- OSHA 300 recordkeeping with TRIR / DART / LTIR calculation
- §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission supported
- Shorter implementation timeline than enterprise suites
Limitations
- NCCI EMR worksheet reconciliation is partial — most users pair with WC carrier claim file
- ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz scorecard package generation is not native
- Per-user pricing scales with employee count above the mid-market band
ISNetworld (scorecard side)
ISNetworld is an owner-client contractor management network that receives the safety scorecard package from contractors (TRIR / DART / LTIR / severity / EMR / OSHA citation history / written safety program) before owner-client subcontract award. ISNetworld is a critical part of the workflow for contractors bidding on oil-and-gas, chemical, refining, and large general-contractor work — but it is fundamentally a receiving network for the contractor's scorecard data, not a system that generates the underlying §1904 recordkeeping. Contractors still need a §1904 recordkeeping system to produce the TRIR / DART / LTIR rate inputs that flow into the ISN scorecard. Avetta, Veriforce, and Browz operate in the same model.
Strengths
- Dominant owner-client contractor management network for oil-and-gas, chemical, refining, and major GC work
- Standardized scorecard format owner clients use across multiple contractor reviews
- Aggregates safety, insurance, and training data in one owner-client view
Limitations
- Does not generate the underlying §1904 OSHA 300 / 300A / 301 records — receives them from contractors
- Subscription fee paid by the contractor, not the owner client
- Each contractor management network (ISN, Avetta, Veriforce, Browz) has slightly different scorecard formats
Paper OSHA 300 + Excel TRIR / DART Spreadsheet
The OSHA-published paper Form 300 / 300A / 301 with Excel TRIR and DART rate calculations is the realistic baseline that many smaller construction and general-industry employers still use. For the smallest operations — under 50 employees, single establishment, low-hazard industry — paper records can be fully compliant on the content layer. The compliance risk is not the underlying §1904 recording itself but the workflow gaps: a §1904.7 recordable determination made without documenting the §1904.7(b)(5)(ii) first-aid-list comparison, a §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application submission missed past the March 2 deadline, a §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification signed by someone who doesn't meet the company-executive definition, a TRIR / DART rate calculated for an ISN scorecard that doesn't reconcile to the §1904.41 ITA data OSHA already has on file, or a §1904.33 retention failure dropping a 2018 case file before the 5-year retention window closed.
Strengths
- Zero software cost
- OSHA-published Form 300 / 300A / 301 are legally acceptable formats
- Works for the smallest operations with low-hazard, single-establishment scope
Limitations
- §1904.7(b)(5)(ii) first-aid-list comparison rarely documented per case
- §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission requires manual upload — easy to miss March 2 deadline
- TRIR / DART rate calculations rarely reconcile to ITA data on file
- §1904.33 5-year retention vulnerable to lost binders and platform migrations
- ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz scorecard package built ad hoc per submission cycle
EMR Calculation + Insurance Impact
The Experience Modification Rate (EMR) is administered by the National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI) in most states (California, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Michigan, Wisconsin, New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Texas operate their own rating bureaus with similar methodology). The NCCI Experience Rating Plan compares the employer's actual workers-compensation losses against the expected losses for an employer of that size in that workers-compensation classification code, using the 3-year experience period that typically excludes the most recent completed policy year (a 2026 EMR pulls from the 2022, 2023, and 2024 policy years). An EMR of 1.00 represents the industry baseline — actual losses match expected losses. An EMR below 1.00 lowers the workers-compensation premium; an EMR above 1.00 raises the workers-compensation premium. The construction-industry national baseline is approximately 1.00 across most NCCI workers-compensation classification codes (specific class-code baselines vary, but the system is designed so that the all-class average across construction approximates 1.00).
The EMR is consequential beyond the workers-compensation premium itself. An EMR above 1.00 typically disqualifies a contractor from federal construction contracting under USACE EM 385-1-1, from most major general-contractor subcontract bid lists, and from owner-direct work for many oil-and-gas, chemical, and refining operators. ISN Networld, Avetta, Veriforce, and Browz contractor management networks report the contractor's EMR in the scorecard package alongside the TRIR / DART / LTIR rates. The relationship between the §1904 recordable determination and the NCCI EMR is indirect but strong — a §1904.7(b)(5) medical-treatment determination that turns a workshop minor injury into a recordable case typically also produces a workers-compensation claim, which flows through the 3-year NCCI experience period into the EMR calculation 2-3 years later. Safety scorecard tracking software that ties the §1904 recordable case file to the workers-compensation claim file on a per-incident basis lets the employer monitor the leading-indicator relationship before the NCCI 3-year experience window closes.
TRIR / DART Rate Formula
The Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and the Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred (DART) rate are calculated using the standardized OSHA formula (number of cases × 200,000) ÷ total employee hours worked during the calendar year. The 200,000 multiplier represents 100 full-time-equivalent workers working 40 hours per week for 50 weeks per year. The TRIR numerator counts every §1904 recordable case — death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, loss of consciousness, significant injury or illness diagnosed by a licensed health care professional, and the special-recording-criteria cases under §1904.8 through §1904.12. The DART numerator counts the subset of recordable cases that involved days away from work, restricted work, or job transfer — the §1904.7(b)(2) and §1904.7(b)(3) cases only. The denominator (total employee hours worked) draws from payroll records and includes temporary worker hours under the §1904.31 multi-employer-relationship coverage rules — a recurring TRIR / DART calculation error is excluding temporary worker hours from the denominator while including temporary worker injuries in the numerator (or vice versa).
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes annual industry-average TRIR and DART rates by NAICS code in the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses. Construction-industry TRIR national averages typically run in the 2.4-3.0 range, with specialty trade contractor sub-industries varying widely — roofing contractors and excavation contractors typically run higher than average, while electrical contractors and finishing contractors typically run below average. The BLS-published industry averages are the benchmarks owner clients and general contractors use to evaluate a contractor's TRIR / DART rates during subcontract prequalification. A contractor with a 4.5 TRIR competing against a 1.8 BLS industry average for their NAICS code will struggle to clear the prequalification gate regardless of the underlying §1904 recordable accuracy.
ISN / Avetta Safety Scorecard Submission
ISN Networld (ISNetworld), Avetta, Veriforce, and Browz are owner-client contractor management networks that receive a standardized contractor safety scorecard package before owner-client subcontract award. The core scorecard package is consistent across the networks: 3-year TRIR (Total Recordable Incident Rate), 3-year DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) rate, 3-year LTIR (Lost Time Incident Rate, restricted to §1904.7(b)(2) days-away cases only), 3-year severity rate (lost workdays × 200,000 ÷ hours worked), 3-year EMR from the most recent rating bureau workers-compensation insurance experience modification calculation, OSHA citation history (typically the most recent 3-5 years of OSHA inspections and citations), the OSHA Form 300A Summary for each of the most recent 3 calendar years, the OSHA Form 300 Log for the same years (some owner clients request the 301 Incident Reports), a written safety and health program meeting the owner client's requirements (commonly aligned with ANSI Z10 or ISO 45001), written substance-abuse and fitness-for-duty programs, a written Stop Work Authority program, and management-system documentation (typically covering safety committee meeting minutes, management review records, internal audit records, and corrective action records).
The contractor's exposure on each scorecard submission is the gap between the calculated rates and the underlying §1904 records. An owner-client safety reviewer who questions a calculated TRIR will ask for the §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 Log entries that produce the numerator and the payroll-reconciled hours-worked denominator. If the §1904 records don't reconcile to the calculated rates, the scorecard is flagged, the contractor moves into review status, and the subcontract award is delayed (or denied). The §1904 records on file with OSHA from the §1904.41 ITA electronic submission are the second-order reconciliation gate — owner-client reviewers commonly cross-check the contractor-submitted 300A against the §1904.41 ITA filing OSHA has on file for the same establishment. Software that ties the §1904 records to the §1904.41 ITA submission to the TRIR / DART / LTIR rate calculations to the ISN / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz scorecard package reduces the network-upload time from days to hours and reduces the scorecard reconciliation risk.
LTIR + Severity Rate Tracking
The Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR, sometimes called Lost Time Case Rate or LTCR) is calculated using the standardized OSHA formula (number of §1904.7(b)(2) days-away-from-work cases × 200,000) ÷ total employee hours worked during the calendar year. The LTIR is narrower than the DART rate — the DART rate includes both §1904.7(b)(2) days-away cases and §1904.7(b)(3) restricted-work or job-transfer cases, while the LTIR is restricted to the §1904.7(b)(2) days-away cases only. The Severity Rate (sometimes called Days Lost Rate) is calculated using the (number of lost workdays × 200,000) ÷ total employee hours worked formula — the numerator counts lost workdays (the actual days the affected employees were away from work), not the number of cases. The severity rate complements the TRIR / DART / LTIR rates by capturing the severity dimension — a fleet of small first-aid-plus-medical-treatment cases produces a high TRIR but a low severity rate, while a small number of catastrophic injuries produces a low TRIR but a high severity rate.
ISN Networld, Avetta, Veriforce, and Browz scorecard packages typically include the LTIR and severity rate alongside the TRIR and DART rate. Owner clients evaluating contractor safety performance look at the three-rate combination — TRIR (overall recordable frequency), DART (severity-adjusted recordable frequency), and LTIR (days-away-only severity) — to understand whether the contractor's safety performance issue is a frequency issue (many minor injuries), a severity issue (few but severe injuries), or both. Software that ties the §1904.7(b)(2) and §1904.7(b)(3) case classification to the LTIR and severity rate calculations alongside the TRIR and DART rate gives the contractor a single record set that supports the full owner-client scorecard package without rebuilding the rate calculations per submission cycle.
Stop Rebuilding the §1904 Record Set, the TRIR / DART Calculation, and the ISN / Avetta Scorecard Package from Scratch
FileFlo organizes your 29 CFR Part 1904 recordable record set, the §1904.7 recordable-determination workflow with audit trail, the §1904.29 OSHA Form 300 / 300A / 301 outputs, the §1904.32(b)(4) executive certification of the 300A annual summary, the §1904.41 Injury Tracking Application electronic submission (including the expanded §1904.41(a)(3) 300 Log + 301 case-level data for high-hazard 100+ establishments), the TRIR / DART / LTIR / severity rate calculations with standardized (cases × 200,000) ÷ hours-worked formula, the NCCI Experience Rating Plan EMR worksheet inputs reconciling against the workers-compensation claim file, and the ISN Networld / Avetta / Veriforce / Browz contractor safety scorecard packages — in one CFR-mapped system. §1904.33 5-year retention across platform migrations, federal-contract (USACE EM 385-1-1) Accident Prevention Plan package.
Start Your 5-Day Free TrialNo setup fees. Unlimited users. Cancel anytime.