FileFlo vs. Veryon (Traxxall + Flightdocs):
Veryon Runs the Cloud + Mobile Engineering.
FileFlo Holds the Compliance Document Evidence.
Veryon is the post-2024 rebrand that consolidated Traxxall, Flightdocs, and the legacy CAMP CMP / ChronicX product lines under one cloud-and-mobile aviation maintenance tracking + flight operations platform for Part 145 repair stations, Part 135 charter operators, and Part 91 corporate flight departments. Veryon holds the engineering data, the AD applicability engine under 14 CFR Part 39, and the hangar-floor mobile app for in-progress §43.9 logging. FileFlo is a different layer — the compliance document evidence platform that pairs WITH Veryon, AI-classifying 600+ document types, holding the §43.9 / §43.11 / §91.417 / §145.219 record file, and producing the one-click FAA-ready audit binder for SAS / OPSS / PI surveillance. Together, not versus. Here is the honest side-by-side at a flat $299/mo.
Almost every Part 145 director of maintenance, Part 135 director of operations, and Part 91 corporate flight department manager I have spoken with in the last twelve months has had some version of this conversation: "We were on Traxxall (or Flightdocs) before the rebrand. Veryon is great at the cloud-mobile maintenance tracking — the techs love the iPad workflow. But the FAA SAS inspector keeps asking for documents Veryon doesn't really hold. Is there a software tool that closes the document binder gap?" Veryon is the post-2024 brand that ATP created when it consolidated three previously independent aviation software product lines: Traxxall (the Montreal-built maintenance tracking platform NetJets and Bombardier-platform operators built their fleets around), Flightdocs (the Bonita Springs FL cloud-and-mobile MRO + maintenance tracking + flight ops platform for Part 91 corporate and Part 135 charter operators), and the legacy CAMP CMP / ChronicX maintenance program and chronic-fault tracking modules ATP acquired separately. Veryon competes with CAMP Systems, WingX, Avantext, ATP CTS, and Continuum Applied Technology as the cloud-and-mobile aviation maintenance tracking platform — and Veryon's cloud-first architecture and native iOS/Android mobile app are genuinely strong against CAMP's heavier desktop legacy. Veryon holds the airframe + engine component status, drives the next-due list against the manufacturer-published maintenance program, runs the AD applicability engine against serial-number ranges under 14 CFR Part 39, and ships the ChronicX-origin chronic-fault tracking under 14 CFR §43.13 performance rules. FileFlo does not attempt to replace any of that — that is engineering data, that is cloud-mobile engineering UX, and Veryon (across all three legacy product lines) has been doing it longer than FileFlo has existed. What FileFlo does is the next layer: the compliance document evidence binder under 14 CFR §43.9, 14 CFR §91.417, 14 CFR §145.219, and 14 CFR Part 39 AD compliance — the document evidence file the FAA Safety Assurance System inspector pulls during a surveillance event. Veryon tracks what is due and runs the hangar-floor mobile workflow; FileFlo holds the proof you did it.
This page is not a takedown of Veryon. Veryon's cloud-mobile architecture is genuinely better than the desktop-legacy competitors for the engineering + maintenance tracking workflow — particularly the Flightdocs-origin mobile app for hangar-floor §43.9 logging and the Traxxall-origin Bombardier / NetJets platform depth. Operators who rely on Veryon Tracking for next-due ALI tracking on a Citation Latitude, Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops for a 5-aircraft Part 135 charter dispatch + maintenance combined workflow, or the ATP technical-publications library for §43.13(a) ICA reference data should keep Veryon. The honest question is whether Veryon is also the right tool for the compliance document evidence binder the FAA inspector pulls during an FAA Order 8900.1 SAS surveillance event — and the answer for most operators is that the document binder side of the workflow is underbuilt in Veryon (across all three legacy product lines) and is the specific gap FileFlo closes. The right operating model for most Part 145 / Part 135 / Part 91 operators is Veryon for the cloud-mobile maintenance tracking + flight ops + AD applicability engine + FileFlo at $299/mo for the compliance document evidence layer. The two products are complements, not substitutes, and the combined operating cost is dramatically lower than the enterprise compliance platform alternatives.
Quick Verdict
- Compliance document evidence binder for FAA SAS / OPSS / PI surveillance
- 14 CFR §43.9 maintenance record entries + §43.11 inspection entries
- 14 CFR §91.417 owner/operator maintenance record retention
- 14 CFR §145.219 Part 145 repair station audit binder
- AI document classification across 600+ aviation document types
- Multi-regulation coverage (14 CFR + 49 CFR + 29 CFR + 40 CFR)
- Flat $299/mo unlimited aircraft — no per-aircraft inflation
- 5-day self-serve trial — live in minutes, no implementation
- Cloud-and-mobile maintenance tracking architecture (Flightdocs heritage)
- Native iOS / Android app for hangar-floor §43.9 logging by technicians
- Traxxall-heritage business jet + helicopter maintenance program depth
- 14 CFR Part 39 AD applicability against serial-number ranges
- ChronicX-origin Veryon Diagnostics chronic-fault tracking
- ATP technical-publications library + §43.13(a) ICA reference data
- Part 135 / Part 91 cloud-first flight ops + dispatch (Flightdocs origin)
The honest answer for most Part 145 / Part 135 / Part 91 operators on Veryon (across all three legacy product lines): keep Veryon for the cloud-mobile maintenance tracking + flight ops + AD applicability engine + add FileFlo at $299/mo for the compliance document evidence layer the FAA SAS / OPSS / PI inspector pulls. The two products are complements — Veryon tracks what is due and runs the hangar-floor mobile workflow, FileFlo holds the proof you did it.
Feature-by-Feature Comparison
Based on publicly available Veryon materials (post-2024 Traxxall + Flightdocs + CAMP CMP rebrand), customer reports, and FileFlo product as of May 2026.
| Feature | FileFlo$299/mo · unlimited aircraft | Veryon (Traxxall / Flightdocs)~$200-$800/aircraft/mo · enterprise quote |
|---|---|---|
| Cloud-and-mobile aircraft maintenance tracking + flight ops (Part 91/135/145) | Not in scope — holds the resulting §43.9 records | Core competency — cloud + native iOS/Android engineering platform |
| Compliance document evidence platform (AI-classified binder) | 600+ doc types AI-classified per aircraft tail | Engineering + flight ops tracking — not compliance document mgmt |
| 14 CFR §43.9 maintenance record entries | Holds + AI-classifies §43.9 entries per tail + date range | Generates entries from work-order data + mobile capture |
| 14 CFR §43.11 annual / 100-hour inspection records | Holds the signed inspection sheet + FAA-ready binder | Drives the inspection due-date and program scope |
| 14 CFR Part 39 Airworthiness Directive (AD) applicability + tracking | Holds the AD compliance documentation only | AD applicability engine against serial-number ranges |
| 14 CFR §91.417 owner/operator maintenance record retention | Indefinite retention + tail-number-organized binder | Operator must export + archive themselves |
| 14 CFR §145.219 Part 145 recordkeeping audit binder | One-click PDF for FAA SAS surveillance visit | Engineering records — not §145.219 evidence binder |
| 14 CFR §43.13(a) Instructions for Continued Airworthiness reference | Holds the ICA document evidence per aircraft | ATP technical-publications library + ICA reference data |
| Form 8130-3 Authorized Release Certificate document storage | AI-classified + linked to installed component record | Operator manages 8130-3 attachments separately |
| Native iOS / Android mobile app for hangar-floor §43.9 logging | Not in scope — destination for completed documents | Flightdocs-origin mobile app — genuine strength |
| Multi-regulation coverage (FAA + DOT + OSHA + EPA) | 14 CFR + 49 CFR + 29 CFR + 40 CFR all in one | Aviation maintenance + flight ops only |
| Veryon Diagnostics — fault code + chronic-discrepancy tracking | Not in scope — fault engineering data | ChronicX-origin chronic-fault tracking module |
| Pricing model | $299/mo flat, unlimited aircraft + users | ~$200-$800/aircraft/mo (per-aircraft enterprise quote) |
| Free trial (no sales call) | 5-day full access, no card | Demo + custom quote + enterprise sales process |
| Implementation timeline | Self-serve · live in 30-60 minutes | Multi-month onboarding + Traxxall/Flightdocs migration path |
| Use case fit | Compliance evidence binder for FAA SAS / OPSS / PI | Cloud-mobile maintenance tracking + Part 135/91 flight ops |
Veryon prices on a per-aircraft, per-module subscription model that varies by legacy product line (Traxxall, Flightdocs, ChronicX, ATP library). Range cited from public sources and operator reports — verify directly with Veryon for an exact quote based on fleet size, aircraft mix, and module selection.
Where Each Tool Sits Inside 14 CFR §43.9, §91.417, §145.219, Part 39, and §43.13
The FAA maintenance recordkeeping, owner/operator retention, Part 145 audit, AD-compliance, and performance-rules regulations map cleanly onto the right operating model. Here is who does what.
14 CFR §43.9 — Content, Form, and Disposition of Maintenance Records
§43.9 requires every person who performs maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration on an aircraft, airframe, engine, propeller, appliance, or component part to make an entry in the maintenance record containing: a description of the work performed, the date of completion, the name of the person performing the work, and (if maintenance is performed by a Part 145 repair station) the signature, certificate number, and kind of certificate held by the person approving the aircraft for return to service under §43.7. Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops (formerly Flightdocs) generates the §43.9 entries from work-order data — particularly via the hangar-floor mobile app where a technician logs the work-in-progress entry directly against the aircraft tail. But the underlying §43.9 record-of-work documents themselves are document evidence the FAA SAS auditor pulls during surveillance. FileFlo wins here for the compliance binder: AI classifies uploaded §43.9 entries against 600+ document types, distinguishes a §43.9 record-of-work from a §43.11 inspection record from a §43.7 RTS sign-off from a Form 8130-3 Authorized Release Certificate, and produces the FAA-investigator-ready binder organized by aircraft tail number, date range, and CFR section reference. Veryon for the in-progress mobile §43.9 logging; FileFlo for the completed-document evidence binder.
14 CFR §91.417 — Maintenance Records
§91.417 places the maintenance record retention responsibility on the owner/operator of the aircraft. §91.417(a)(1) requires retention of records of maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alteration records until the work is repeated, superseded, or for one year — whichever is first. §91.417(a)(2) requires indefinite retention of: the total time in service of the airframe and engines, the current status of life-limited parts, the time since the last overhaul of required-overhaul components, the current inspection status under §91.409 annual or progressive inspection, the current status of applicable AD compliance under Part 39, and copies of the Form 337 Major Repair and Alteration records. Veryon Tracking holds the engineering data driving the next-due list — but the §91.417 record retention file the owner/operator must keep and produce on FAA request is document evidence, not engineering tracking data, and is what an aircraft pre-purchase inspector will demand during a sale due diligence package. FileFlo wins here for the owner/operator binder: indefinite retention with tail-number organization, AI-classified document types, and one-click §91.417 evidence binder for the FAA inspector or for aircraft sale due diligence.
14 CFR §145.219 — Recordkeeping (Part 145 Repair Stations)
§145.219 requires every Part 145 repair station to maintain records of all maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations the repair station performs for at least two years and provide the records to the FAA Administrator upon request. The records must include the description of the work performed under §43.9, the date the work was completed, the name of the person performing the work, the signature and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft or component for return to service under §43.7, and the Form 8130-3 Authorized Release Certificate when applicable. The FAA Safety Assurance System (SAS) surveillance protocol under FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 6 directs the Principal Inspector (PI) or Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI) to pull §145.219 records during routine surveillance, during a Part 145 renewal under §145.57, during an investigation of a §145.221 reported failure or malfunction, or during a §145.223 capability list review. FileFlo wins here cleanly for Part 145 repair stations on Veryon: one-click §145.219-ready audit binder organized by work order, customer, date range, and aircraft tail number, with every supporting document AI-classified (RTS sign-off, Form 8130-3, §43.9 entry, capability list reference, parts traceability record), expiration-tracked, and stamped with an immutable audit trail. The civil-penalty exposure under 49 U.S.C. § 46301 runs up to $37,377 per violation per day under the 2026 inflation-adjusted civil-penalty table — the binder is what stands between the repair station and the multi-violation finding during a Part 145 surveillance event.
14 CFR Part 39 — Airworthiness Directives
Part 39 makes Airworthiness Directives mandatory. §39.7 prohibits operating a product to which an AD applies except in accordance with the AD's requirements, and §39.11 governs the methods of compliance. This is one of Veryon's strongest competencies — across both the Traxxall and Flightdocs legacy product lines, Veryon determines whether an AD applies to the operator's aircraft serial number, identifies the recurring compliance interval (one-time terminating action vs recurring inspection vs recurring hourly limit), and tracks the next compliance due date against the aircraft current time and cycles. Veryon does this excellently; FileFlo does not attempt to replace Veryon's AD applicability engine. What FileFlo holds is the AD-compliance documentation that the FAA inspector pulls during a §91.403 owner/operator responsibility review or a Part 145 §145.211 capability list review: the Veryon-generated AD-compliance status report, the signed §43.9 maintenance record entry recording the AD-compliance action, the Form 337 Major Repair and Alteration record for any AD-mandated modification, and the §91.405 maintenance record retention file the operator must keep for the life of the aircraft. Use Veryon for AD applicability; use FileFlo for AD compliance document evidence.
14 CFR §43.13 — Performance Rules (General)
§43.13(a) requires every person performing maintenance, alteration, or preventive maintenance on an aircraft, engine, propeller, or appliance to use the methods, techniques, and practices prescribed in the current manufacturer's maintenance manual or Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) prepared by its manufacturer, or other methods, techniques, and practices acceptable to the Administrator. §43.13(b) requires using tools, equipment, and test apparatus necessary to ensure completion of the work in accordance with accepted industry practices. The ATP technical-publications library that Veryon inherited from ATP's pre-rebrand catalog is exactly the §43.13(a) Manufacturer's Maintenance Manual / Instructions for Continued Airworthiness reference data that drives the maintenance program. Veryon holds the ICA data; FileFlo holds the ICA document evidence per aircraft (the ICA document itself, the §43.13(a) reference citation in the §43.9 maintenance record entry, and the §43.13(b) tooling and equipment calibration records). Combined operating model: Veryon for §43.13(a) ICA data + FileFlo for §43.13 document evidence binder.
Real Pricing Comparison
FileFlo is one flat price for the compliance document evidence layer regardless of aircraft count. Veryon prices per-aircraft, per-module across its Traxxall + Flightdocs + ChronicX legacy lines. The math escalates with every aircraft + every Veryon module the operator adds.
* Pricing range based on public Veryon sales materials and operator reports across the Traxxall + Flightdocs + ChronicX legacy product lines. Contact Veryon for an exact per-aircraft quote based on fleet size, module selection, and platform tier.
The pricing comparison is not apples-to-apples. Veryon is a cloud-and-mobile aviation maintenance tracking + flight ops engineering platform; FileFlo is a compliance document evidence platform. The right operating model is “Veryon for the cloud-mobile maintenance program + FileFlo for the §145.219 / §91.417 / §43.9 audit binder” — combined cost typically lower than enterprise compliance platforms alone.
When to Use Each (and When to Use Both)
Add FileFlo if you...
- Are a Part 145 repair station whose FAA SAS surveillance keeps surfacing §145.219 document gaps
- Are a Part 135 charter operator whose POI / OPSS auditor pulls §135.63 + §135.21 docs Veryon does not hold
- Are a Part 91 corporate flight department managing the §91.417 binder for due-diligence sale or FAA inquiry
- Want AI to auto-classify 600+ aviation compliance documents — no manual filing
- Need cross-regulation coverage — FAA + DOT + OSHA + EPA for ground operations
- Need a one-click FAA-ready audit binder for SAS / OPSS / PI surveillance events
- Want unlimited aircraft seats without per-aircraft enterprise inflation
Keep Veryon if you...
- Need cloud-and-mobile maintenance tracking with native iOS/Android app
- Need the Flightdocs-heritage hangar-floor §43.9 mobile logging workflow
- Need Traxxall-heritage business jet + helicopter program depth (NetJets / Bombardier)
- Need 14 CFR Part 39 AD applicability against serial-number ranges
- Need ChronicX-origin chronic-fault tracking via Veryon Diagnostics
- Need the ATP technical-publications library for §43.13(a) ICA reference data
- Need Part 135 / Part 91 cloud-first flight ops + dispatch (Flightdocs origin)
"We Added FileFlo to Veryon Because..."
Real workflows directors of maintenance, chief inspectors, and corporate flight department managers describe after pairing FileFlo with Veryon Tracking (formerly Traxxall) and Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops (formerly Flightdocs).
"I run the Part 145 repair station side — we migrated from Traxxall to the Veryon brand last year and stayed because the cloud-mobile UX is genuinely better than CAMP for our techs. But during our last FAA SAS surveillance, the PI pulled §145.219 records by work order and customer, and we spent three days assembling the binder from Veryon exports, paper RTS sign-offs, and the file room. We added FileFlo for the §145.219 evidence binder layer. Same SAS audit this year took 75 minutes — one-click PDF per work order. Veryon still runs the engineering and the mobile workflow. FileFlo handles the binder."
"We're a 4-aircraft Part 135 charter operator on Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops (came over from Flightdocs in the rebrand). Veryon costs us about $32K a year all-in and the mobile app is the reason our techs actually log §43.9 entries the same day — that workflow is real. But our POI surveillance kept pulling §135.21 manual currency, §135.63 crewmember records, and §135.293 competency check records — none of which Veryon really holds. We added FileFlo at $299/mo for the compliance document evidence binder, organized by crewmember and by aircraft tail. Our combined Veryon + FileFlo annual spend is still less than the enterprise aviation compliance platforms quoted us, and we kept the cloud-mobile engineering we built our maintenance program around."
"I manage a Part 91 corporate flight department — a Challenger 350 and a King Air 350. We've been on Traxxall / Veryon Tracking for six years. Last year our principal sold the Challenger and the buyer's pre-purchase inspector wanted a §91.417 records package going back to manufacture. Veryon had the next-due data and the AD compliance status export, but the actual §43.9 maintenance record entries, §43.11 inspection records, Form 337 alterations, and §43.13(a) ICA references were scattered across our network drive, paper logbook, and Veryon exports. We added FileFlo for the §91.417 owner/operator retention binder. Sale due diligence now takes 45 minutes instead of three weeks."
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Veryon, and how does the 2024 Traxxall + Flightdocs + CAMP CMP rebrand affect buyers in 2026?
Veryon is the cloud-and-mobile aviation maintenance tracking + flight operations platform formed when ATP rebranded as Veryon and consolidated three previously independent product lines: Traxxall (maintenance tracking for business jets, helicopters, and Part 145 repair stations — originally built in Montreal and adopted heavily by NetJets and Bombardier-platform operators), Flightdocs (cloud-and-mobile MRO + maintenance tracking for Part 91 corporate, Part 135 charter, and Part 145 repair stations — originally a Bonita Springs FL competitor to CAMP), and the legacy CAMP CMP / ChronicX maintenance program offerings ATP acquired separately. The post-2024 buyer reality is that Veryon now sells Traxxall, Flightdocs, ChronicX, the ATP maintenance library, and the Veryon Diagnostics fault tracking module under one brand — but the underlying platforms still have distinct architectures, distinct pricing tiers, and distinct migration paths from the legacy product names. When operators evaluate "Veryon" in 2026, they are usually evaluating one of three specific product lines: Veryon Tracking (formerly Traxxall) for business jet + helicopter maintenance tracking, Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops (formerly Flightdocs) for Part 135 + Part 91 cloud-mobile combined ops, or the ATP maintenance library for technical publications and ICA reference data. FileFlo does not attempt to replace any of those three engineering-tracking platforms — they each hold the next-due airworthiness limitations item, the AD applicability engine against serial-number ranges, and the OEM-aligned maintenance program. FileFlo is the layer the FAA SAS / OPSS / PI inspector pulls during surveillance: the §43.9 / §43.11 / §91.417 / §145.219 document evidence binder. CAMP for engineering data, Veryon for cloud-mobile engineering data, FileFlo for the FAA document binder — three different layers, all complements.
How much does Veryon cost vs FileFlo?
Veryon prices on a per-aircraft, per-module subscription model with custom quotes that depend on which legacy platform the operator subscribes to and which Veryon modules are included. Public industry reporting and operator-side disclosures put Veryon's typical per-aircraft pricing at roughly $200-$800 per aircraft per month depending on aircraft type (turbojet, turboprop, helicopter, piston), platform tier (Veryon Tracking vs Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops vs ChronicX add-ons), fleet size discount tier, and whether the contract includes the ATP technical-publications library, the Veryon Diagnostics fault tracking module, or the Flightdocs flight ops / scheduling module. A single-aircraft Part 91 corporate operator on a basic Veryon Tracking subscription typically pays $300-$500 per aircraft per month ($3,600-$6,000 per aircraft per year). A 5-aircraft Part 135 charter operator on Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops with the mobile app typically pays $500-$700 per aircraft per month ($30,000-$42,000 per year for the 5-aircraft fleet). A 15-aircraft Part 145 repair station with full ATP library access typically pays $400-$600 per aircraft per month ($72,000-$108,000 per year). FileFlo is a flat $299 per month or $2,990 per year — unlimited aircraft, unlimited users, all compliance features. The pricing comparison is NOT a substitution comparison. Veryon sells the cloud-and-mobile maintenance tracking + flight ops engineering platform; FileFlo sells the compliance document evidence layer the FAA inspector pulls. The right operating model is keep Veryon for the cloud-mobile engineering + flight ops AND add FileFlo for the §43.9 / §43.11 / §91.417 / §145.219 document binder. Verify Veryon pricing during the Veryon sales process at veryon.com; FileFlo pricing is locked at getfileflo.com/pricing.
Will FileFlo hold the 14 CFR §43.9 maintenance record entries Veryon (Traxxall / Flightdocs) currently tracks?
Yes — and the post-2024 merger context makes the FileFlo + Veryon pairing even more clear-cut than the CAMP pairing. 14 CFR §43.9 requires every person who performs maintenance, preventive maintenance, rebuilding, or alteration on an aircraft, airframe, engine, propeller, appliance, or component part to make an entry in the maintenance record containing: a description of the work performed, the date of completion, the name of the person performing the work, and (if maintenance is performed by a Part 145 repair station) the signature, certificate number, and kind of certificate held by the person approving the aircraft for return to service under §43.7. Veryon Tracking (formerly Traxxall) and Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops (formerly Flightdocs) generate the §43.9 entries from work-order data — that is the engineering-tracking core. But the FAA SAS auditor under FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 6 does not pull screenshots of the Veryon engineering system during surveillance; the auditor pulls the §43.9 record-of-work documents themselves, organized by tail number, date range, and CFR section. FileFlo's AI classifies these documents on upload — distinguishing a §43.9 maintenance record entry from a §43.11 inspection entry from a §43.7 RTS sign-off from a Form 8130-3 — and produces the FAA-investigator-ready binder. Veryon for the cloud-mobile engineering tracking; FileFlo for the FAA document binder.
Does FileFlo replace the Veryon mobile app the maintenance technicians use on the hangar floor?
No — and the mobile UX is one of Veryon's genuine strengths and not something FileFlo attempts to replace. Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops (formerly Flightdocs) ships with a native iOS and Android app that maintenance technicians, line mechanics, and chief inspectors use on the hangar floor to log §43.9 maintenance record entries directly against the aircraft tail, snap photos of work performed, attach inspection sheets, and capture the §43.7 return-to-service signature in-line. The Veryon mobile workflow is a legitimately good piece of engineering — particularly for Part 135 charter operators and Part 91 corporate operators whose maintenance technicians are not desk-bound and need offline-capable tablet workflows. FileFlo is not a hangar-floor mobile app for work-in-progress §43.9 logging. FileFlo is the destination for the completed compliance documents — the signed §43.9 entry, the Form 8130-3, the §43.13(a) ICA reference, the §145.211 capability list entry — all AI-classified, retention-tracked, and produced as a one-click §91.417 owner/operator binder or §145.219 repair station binder for FAA surveillance. The pattern operators run is: Veryon mobile app for §43.9 in-progress logging + FileFlo for the completed-document evidence binder the FAA inspector pulls. Two different surfaces, two different layers, complementary not competing.
Can FileFlo build the Part 145 §145.219 audit binder for an FAA SAS surveillance visit when our shop runs on Veryon?
Yes — and this is FileFlo's strongest use case for Part 145 repair stations on Veryon Tracking (formerly Traxxall). 14 CFR §145.219 requires every Part 145 repair station to maintain records of all maintenance, preventive maintenance, and alterations the repair station performs for at least two years and provide the records to the FAA Administrator upon request. The records must include: the description of the work performed under §43.9, the date the work was completed, the name of the person performing the work, the signature and certificate number of the person approving the aircraft or component for return to service under §43.7, and the Form 8130-3 Authorized Release Certificate when applicable. The FAA Safety Assurance System (SAS) surveillance protocol under FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 6 directs the Principal Inspector (PI) or Aviation Safety Inspector (ASI) to pull the §145.219 records during routine surveillance, during a Part 145 renewal under §145.57, during an investigation of a §145.221 reported failure or malfunction, or during a §145.223 capability list review. Veryon Tracking holds the engineering-tracking data — work order routing, technician assignment, next-due ALI list — but the §145.219 record-of-work file the SAS inspector pulls is a document evidence binder organized by customer, work order, and aircraft tail. FileFlo produces a one-click §145.219-ready audit binder organized by work order, customer, date range, and aircraft tail number, with every supporting document AI-classified (RTS sign-off, Form 8130-3, §43.9 entry, capability list reference, parts traceability record), expiration-tracked, and stamped with an immutable audit trail. The civil-penalty exposure under 49 U.S.C. § 46301 runs up to $37,377 per violation per day for 2026 — the binder is what stands between the repair station and the multi-violation finding during an FAA surveillance event.
What about Part 135 charter operators and Part 91 corporate flight departments running Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops (formerly Flightdocs)?
Same pairing logic — different document scope. Part 135 charter operators on Veryon Tracking + Flight Ops still need the §135.63 recordkeeping requirements binder (crewmember records, aircraft records, training records, flight time and duty records), the §135.21 manual currency file, the §135.293 pilot competency check records, the §135.297 instrument proficiency check records, and the §135.443 airworthiness check records — all of which are document evidence the FAA POI / OPSS auditor pulls during a Part 135 surveillance event under FAA Order 8900.1 Volume 3. Veryon's Flight Ops module holds some of the operational records — duty time, flight scheduling, dispatch — but the compliance evidence binder layer is a different workflow. Part 91 corporate flight departments using Veryon Tracking for maintenance tracking still need the §91.417 owner/operator maintenance record retention file (kept until the work is repeated or for one year, whichever is first, except for §91.417(a)(2) records which are kept indefinitely with the aircraft), the §91.409 inspection records (annual or progressive), the §91.411 altimeter system test records (every 24 months), the §91.413 ATC transponder test records (every 24 months), and the Subpart F large/turbojet operating rules documentation if applicable. Veryon tracks the engineering + flight ops side; FileFlo holds the document evidence binder. The $299/mo flat pricing is the same regardless of Part 91, Part 135, or Part 145 — FileFlo does not price per-aircraft like Veryon, so a Part 91 single-jet operator and a 5-aircraft Part 135 charter and a 15-aircraft Part 145 repair station all pay the same flat rate for the compliance document layer.
Authored by Chad Griffith, Founder of FileFlo. Last reviewed 2026-05-31. Software perspective — comparing Veryon (the post-2024 brand consolidating Traxxall, Flightdocs, and CAMP CMP / ChronicX legacy product lines) and FileFlo as compliance software products. References: 14 CFR §43.9, 14 CFR §91.417, 14 CFR §145.219, 14 CFR Part 39, 14 CFR §43.13, 49 U.S.C. § 46301.
Add the FAA Compliance Document Binder — At Flat $299/mo
5-day free trial. No credit card. No sales call. No multi-month onboarding. Build your first 14 CFR §145.219 or §91.417 audit binder today — at a fraction of enterprise aviation compliance platform pricing.
$299/mo · Unlimited aircraft · Cancel anytime · No implementation fees